She’s speaking more slowly and deliberately than anyone who’s taken the stand yet, gesturing with her hands almost constantly, bidding us to remember things we’ve heard earlier, and providing regular analogies. Her lecture style definitely got the jury’s attention. So far, I’m only seeing them look away when there’s a new slide on screen.

The judge doesn’t seem quite as enrapt; then again, he’d warned both parties earlier today about time.

Update: She’s also clearly gunning for Dr. Bernheim, who was a force for Epic the other day. She keeps bringing up how he’s mistaken in one way or another, how some finding “wouldn’t be relevant in Dr. Bernheim’s world” for example.